🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard women from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad protest both within the country and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a national petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for additional review if he has objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable discussions in other member states